Elections and Constituencies - Hartley-Kent: The Website for Hartley

We are used to the idea of each constituency being of equal size, but this is a comparatively new idea. Before 1832 each incorporated borough returned 2 MPs. Kent had 8 boroughs (Rochester, Maidstone, Canterbury, Sandwich, Dover, Hythe, Queenborough, New Romney), the latter two were "rotten" boroughs - New Romney had only 8 electors! This left the rest of the county, including Hartley, to be represented by 2 MPs. Of course only a tiny fraction of people were entitled to vote. Only male freeholders with land worth 40 shillings per annum could vote. This meant Hartley had only 3 electors

The earliest Parliament is thought to be in 1236 when each shire sent two knights to represent them.  It was not until Simon de Montfort's parliament of 1264 that they were required to be elected though.  His parliament was also the first to allow boroughs to send 2 MPs too.  15th century returns suggest that elections were held at Rochester or Canterbury.  One notable member was Geoffrey Chaucer, author of the Canterbury Tales, who was MP for Kent in 1386.  Analysis by Roskell and others suggest that the majority of MPs were middling in wealth, but about a fifth were not particularly wealthy.

For more information, see the Wikipedia page on the Kent Constituency.

In 1832 the Great Reform Act remedied the worst abuses of the old system, it was passed in the teeth of opposition which included the Conservatives and the bishops. Overall Kent went from 18 to 16 MPs, but the vast county division was divided into East and West, so representation was slightly improved for Hartley. This Act introduced electoral registers for the first time.

People from Hartley would have to go to Gravesend to vote.

The next boundary changes were in 1867, when the West Kent division was split into West Kent and Mid Kent because of population increases. In addition the Gravesend Borough Constituency was created. Hartley lay at the eastern extremity of the West Kent seat, something of a familiar theme in the years to come. We were still a long way from the modern system.

These early elections were subject to rough and tumble which make modern elections seem fairly tame.  At the 1832 election the successful Lib (Liberal) candidate Thomas Rider said he "had been witness to such a system of corruption and intimidation that he was convinced that a full and fair expression of the elective franchise could not be secured without [the secret ballot]", it was said that most voters in Blackheath were intimidated not to vote for him (Liverpool Mercury 28.12.1832, Morning Chronicle 31.1.1833).  In the 1859 election the Conservatives were rumoured to be behind a gang of roughs who ran riot in Dartford on election day (Daily News 9.5.1859).  The Liverpool Mercury said "The Tories are accused, not only of  resorting to all the ordinary agencies and artifices that could possibly be employed at the late election, that is of having used bribery, corruption, intimidation, coercion etc, but of having enlisted .... the lowest ruffians of the prize ring....." (Liverpool Mercury 23.5.1859).  

In 1880 three members of the Farmer's Alliance Party from Crockenhill were fined for having a van pulled by an emaciated horse at Sydenham Hill, which they said represented the neglect of farming interests (Lloyds Weekly Newspaper 25.4.1880).

We are used to elections by secret ballot, but the secret ballot was not introduced until the Ballot Act 1872. Until then the votes of each person were recorded and would be published in "Poll Books". Public voting also allowed the parties to know hour by hour how they were doing in a poll. The Ballot Act is credited with abolishing the power of landlords to force their tenants to vote for them, for example one of the candidates in 1852 and 1857 was the Conservative William Masters Smith who was the landlord of George Best of Hartley, however as George Best continued to be a member of the Conservative party after 1872 this would suggest he would have voted for Mr Masters Smith anyway.

The equal constituency system as we know it was introduced in 1885 when Hartley became part of the new Dartford (North West Kent) constituency

Universal male suffrage and the secret ballot did not stop all malpractices. At the 1886 election, a Dartford Conservative employer was accused of trying to prevent their Irish workers from leaving to vote for the Liberals (Freemans Journal 9.5.1886).

The Liberal Landslide of 1906 did not make many inroads in Kent, but history was made when James Rowlands became the first non-Conservative member for Hartley since the 1885 reforms. He stood as "Liberal-Labour" and in his 1918 election leaflet he still claimed to be that at heart, although by then he ran solely under the Liberal banner.

The Conservatives made strenuous efforts to win the seat back and did so in 1910. It was mentioned that women party workers from the safe seat of Tunbridge Wells were brought to Dartford to help, still a common tactic of the parties. Elections were big spectator events then; thousands were reported to have assembled outside the Dartford Council offices to hear the returning officer declare the result (he would have already announced it to those in the hall). Mr Mitchell is said to have been carried shoulder high by his supporters to the Conservative offices (South Eastern Gazette 1.2.1910). However their success was to be brief, there was a second election in 1910 and James Rowlands was back. It was in those elections that Dartford learned what it was like to be a marginal seat, with visits from leading party members.

In 1917 there was a new review of Parliamentary Constituencies. The Dartford seat was made smaller, to become Dartford and Erith. Most of the rural disticts of Dartford and Bromley, including Hartley, went into a new Chislehurst seat. Most of the parties who attended the Boundary Commission Enquiry at Maidstone on 24 July 1917 were happy with the this proposal. Both Conservativea and Labour supported this, however the local Liberals said a Dartford-Erith seat at 103,000 electors would be too large and that a better option would be a seat made up of Dartford and Dartford Rural District. (Gravesend Reporter 28.7.1918)

In 1918 electors were presented with a choice between Conservatives and the National Party, a right wing splinter group from the Conservatives. In the end the election was won by Sir Alfred Smithers. He was a financier with several rail interests including the Grand Trunk Railway in Canada, where there is a town named after him. He was MP until 1922 and from 1924 to 1945 his son Sir Waldron Smithers was MP.  The high point for the Conservatives came in 1931 when as "National Government" candidate they won 85% of the vote, Labour chipped away at this in 1935 and Chislehurst was once of the seats that was flipped in the Labour landslide of 1945.

Meanwhile in our old constituency of Dartford, James Rowlands died in 1920 and Labour gained the seat in the resulting by-election. The photo above shows the count, which is little changed today, with four of the candidates anxiously watching as election staff work.

The next general review of boundaries had to wait for nearly 30 years by the new Boundary Commission for England which had been established by a 1944 Act of Parliament. Regular reviews of boundaries now became mandatory. Since 1918 the electorate of Chislehurst had increased from 26,801 to 110,000 so it was clear that changes were needed.  The Gravesend Reporter of 20 December 1947 announced that as a result of the review, Hartley, along with the rest of the Dartford Rural district was to be moved to Orpington constituency. This was not to the Parish Council's liking as their choices were first Chislehurst and then Dartford. They unanimously passed a motion of objection to be sent to the Home Secretary in February 1948. The following month they had decided Gravesend Constituency was a better choice. However the Orpington proposal was confirmed in July 1948. Later that year the Hartley Conservatives held a farewell party for the Chislehurst prospective candidate, Pat Hornsby-Smith (Gravesend Reporter 9.10.1948).

Hartley may have been in a new constituency but they found themselves with a familiar MP in Sir Waldron Smithers, who had been the MP for Chislehurst from 1924 to 1945. In the boundary review that followed he chose to fight the safer seat of Orpington.

Hartley was to remain in the Orpington seat for just the two elections of 1950 and 1951. The Boundary Commission wanted to create a new seat out of Dartford for Erith and Crayford (Times, 20.11.1954), which meant that the Rural District had to move back to the Dartford seat. For once it appears all parties were happy with the boundary change. Orpington Labour Party "wholeheartedly welcomed" the changes to Orpington. The SE Region Conservatives wanted the whole Dartford Rural District put in with Dartford Constituency as they said they look to Dartford not Orpington, and is currently divided between Chislehurst and Orpington seats. Dartford Borough Council agreed, but didn't like the name change to "County Constituency" (done when a seat has a rural component). (Source: National Archives File AF1/311).  The changes made the seat a much more winnable prospect for the Conservatives.

For most of this time our MP was Sydney Irving, later Lord Irving of Dartford. He was deputy chief whip (1964-66) and then a Deputy Speaker (1966-70). Richard Crossman's diaries record the vigorous defence he put up for his constituents over the issue of New Ash Green. 1970 was one of those elections where most polls failed to detect a late swing to the Conservatives, so much so that the famous swingometer on the election night coverage had to be amended by hand. Dartford was one of those seats that probably fell at the last minute.

From 1974 to 1983 Hartley was part of the ultra-safe Conservative constituency of Sevenoaks. For most of the time our MP was Sir John Rogers, who had been MP since 1950 and had spent most of his career on the backbenches, as one of the "knights of the shires". I am not sure, but I seem to remember that Mr Scanlan, the Labour candidate in 1974 may have run a shop in New Ash Green.

The 3rd periodic review of the Boundary Commission ran from 1976 to 1983.  It resulted in the parishes of Hartley, Longfield, Fawkham, Ash cum Ridley and Horton Kirby being moved from Sevenoaks to Dartford constituency.

Boundary changes in 1994 meant that New Ash Green was transferred to Sevenoaks constituency. This had the effect of notionally reducing the Conservative majority in 1992 from 17.2% to 14.7%. Hartley Parish Council then campaigned to be in Sevenoaks too, because they believed (wrongly) that Hartley would be included in plans for the East Thames corridor.

The boundaries were looked at again in 2005. As well as looking at population changes, the commission had to consider recent changes to local government boundaries, which meant for example Hartley and Hodsoll Street ward was split between two constituencies.  This time Hartley's local Conservatives made cause with Labour to favour a move to Sevenoaks Constituency.  The national Conservative party argued for Hartley to remain in Dartford.  Following a 5 day public enquiry held in Ashford the chairman of the enquiry recommended that Hartley remain in Dartford constituency, partly because it would be the minimum change option and partly because evidence from Dartford Borough Council and others that Hartley has more in common with Dartford than Sevenoaks.  He particularly praised Dartford Borough Council's submission as a model for others to follow.  Further details and a transcript of the public enquiry can be found at the archived version of the Boundary Commission's website.

Dartford is officially the country's "bellweather" seat, in that it has the longest record of being won by the party that wins the election nationally since 1964.  In truth for many years the seat appears to be slipping away from Labour.  The party does not need to win Dartford to win the General Election.  The 12% swing required for Labour to take the seat now would give them a 200 seat majority in the House of Commons if repeated nationally.

In the 2017 election both Labour and Conservatives increased their share of the vote, thanks to the collapse of the UKIP vote.  Their vote in Dartford and Gravesham appears to have split roughly 2-1 in favour of the Conservatives (although this may be disguising switchers from Conservative to Labour).

The Conservative government in 2010 passed a law to reduce the the number of constituencies nationwide from 650 to 600 (strangely enough commentators noted that the main beneficiaries of doing this would be the Conservatives themselves!) Needless to say this has the effect of increasing the electoral quota for each seat (that is the number electors per MP). While the existing Dartford seat met the quota, some of the surrounding seats did not, this led the Boundary Commission to propose moving Hartley into an expanded Gravesend seat.

The proposal was supported by the local Conservative and Labour parties, Labour's reasoning was that they preferred the whole of Dartford and Gravesham boroughs to be in one constituency. The Liberal Democrats however suggested that the numbers to make up Gravesend should come from Wrotham and 2 other wards in Tonbridge and Malling, they would then have added Ash parish to Dartford too. There were 4 replies from Hartley, all favoured staying in Dartford, one reluctantly supported the recommendations by acknowledging the rules the Commmission has to work under and saying Gravesend was the second best option. Hartley Parish Council having opposed staying in Dartford in the 2003 review was now in favour of staying in Dartford. The Boundary Commission upheld the proposals as regards Hartley, but accepted another proposal that Hextable and not Horton Kirby should be in the Dartford seat. Once again it was suggested that the borders of Dartford Borough are wrong and should include more parishes to the south.

One counter proposal which had a lot of support was to move Swanscombe (and possibly Southfleet too) to the Gravesend seat and include Hartley and other parishes in the Dartford seat, because Swanscombe and Southfleet clearly look to Gravesend more than Dartford. The commission rejected this because it would involve splitting Dartford Borough between two seats.

The new boundaries were due to come into force in 2013, but parliament decided to postpone the review until 2018. The new government has pledged to reinstate them then.

History of Parliament website (with a few gaps, gives a list of MPs and election results where known from 1386 to 1832)